8 resultados encontrados
2Ἡ ἐπιστολὴ ἡμῶν ὑμεῖς ἐστε, ἐγγεγραμμένη ἐν ταῖς καρδίαις ἡμῶν, γινωσκομένη καὶ ἀναγινωσκομένη ὑπὸ πάντων ἀνθρώπων·
11εἰ γὰρ τὸ καταργούμενον διὰ δόξης, πολλῷ μᾶλλον τὸ μένον ἐν δόξῃ.
12Ἔχοντες οὖν τοιαύτην ἐλπίδα, πολλῇ παρρησίᾳ χρώμεθα—
7πάντα στέγει, πάντα πιστεύει, πάντα ἐλπίζει, πάντα ὑπομένει·
8ἡ ἀγάπη οὐδέποτε ἐκπίπτει.εκπιπτει f35 [98%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ πιπτει 𝕻46ℵA,B,C,048 [2%] NUΕἴτε δὲ προφητεῖαι, καταργηθήσονται· εἴτε γλῶσσαι, παύσονται· εἴτε γνῶσις, καταργηθήσεται·
13Νυνὶ δὲ μένει πίστις, ἐλπίς, ἀγάπη, τὰ τρία ταῦτα· μείζων δὲ τούτων ἡ ἀγάπη.
5Ἡμεῖς γὰρ Πνεύματι ἐκ πίστεως ἐλπίδα δικαιοσύνης ἀπεκδεχόμεθα.
6Ἐν γὰρ Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ οὔτε περιτομή τι ἰσχύει οὔτε ἀκροβυστία, ἀλλὰ πίστις δι᾿ ἀγάπης ἐνεργουμένη.
22Ὁ δὲ καρπὸς τοῦ Πνεύματός ἐστιν ἀγάπη, χαρά, εἰρήνη, μακροθυμία, χρηστότης, ἀγαθωσύνη,αγαθωσυνη rell ¦ αγαθοσυνη [25%] πίστις,
3ὅς, ἰδὼν Πέτρον καὶ Ἰωάννην μέλλοντας εἰσιέναι εἰς τὸ ἱερόν, ἠρώτα ἐλεημοσύνην.ελεημοσυνην f35 (D) [94%] HF,RP,OC,CP ¦ 1 λαβειν ℵA,B,C [6%] TR,NU
5Ὁ δὲ ἐπεῖχεν αὐτοῖς, προσδοκῶν τι παρ᾿ αὐτῶν λαβεῖν.
24»Καὶ πάντες δὲ οἱ προφῆται, ἀπὸ Σαμουὴλ καὶ τῶν καθεξῆς, ὅσοι ἐλάλησαν, καὶ προκατήγγειλανπροκατηγγειλαν f35 [25%] TR ¦ κατηγγειλαν (ℵ)A,B,C(D) [75%] HF,RP,OC,CP,NU τὰς ἡμέρας ταύτας.
3—καὶ πᾶς ὁ ἔχων τὴν ἐλπίδα ταύτην ἐπ᾿ αὐτῷ ἁγνίζει ἑαυτόν, καθὼς ἐκεῖνος ἁγνός ἐστιν.
11Ὅτι αὕτη ἐστὶν ἡ ἀγγελίααγγελια rell ¦ επαγγελια ℵC [10%] ἣν ἠκούσατε ἀπ᾿ ἀρχῆς, ἵνα ἀγαπῶμεν ἀλλήλους
23Καὶ αὕτη ἐστὶν ἡ ἐντολὴ αὐτοῦ, ἵνα πιστεύσωμενπιστευσωμεν f35 B (66.9%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ πιστευωμεν ℵA,C (26.5%) ¦ πιστευομεν (5.4%) ¦ πιστευσομεν (1.2%) τῷ ὀνόματι τοῦ Υἱοῦ αὐτοῦ, Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, καὶ ἀγαπῶμεν ἀλλήλους, καθὼς ἔδωκεν ἐντολήν.εντολην f35 [80%] RP,HF,OC,CP ¦ 1 ημιν ℵA,B,C [20%] TR,NU
2δι᾿ οὗ καὶ τὴν προσαγωγὴν ἐσχήκαμεν, τῇ πίστει,τη πιστει f35 (ℵ)C (95.9%) OC,RP,HF,TR,CP[NU] ¦ εν 12 A (2.7%) ¦ --- B,0220 (0.8%) ¦ one other variant (0.5%) εἰς τὴν χάριν ταύτην ἐν ᾗ ἑστήκαμεν, καὶ καυχώμεθα ἐπ᾿ ἐλπίδι τῆς δόξης τοῦ Θεοῦ.
4ἡ δὲ ὑπομονή, δοκιμήν· ἡ δὲ δοκιμή, ἐλπίδα·
5ἡ δὲ ἐλπὶς οὐ καταισχύνει,καταισχυνει rell ¦ καταισχυνη [15%] ὅτι ἡ ἀγάπη τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐκκέχυται ἐν ταῖς καρδίαις ἡμῶν διὰ Πνεύματος Ἁγίου τοῦ δοθέντος ἡμῖν.
20τῇ γὰρ ματαιότητι ἡ κτίσις ὑπετάγη, οὐχ ἑκοῦσα, ἀλλὰ διὰ τὸν ὑποτάξαντα, ἐπ᾿επ f35 𝕻27A,C [99%] OC,RP,HF,TR,CP ¦ εφ 𝕻46ℵB [1%] NU ἐλπίδι
24Τῇ γὰρ ἐλπίδι ἐσώθημεν, ἐλπὶς δὲ βλεπομένη οὐκ ἔστιν ἐλπίς—ὃ γὰρ βλέπει τις, τί καὶτι και f35 A,C [97%] OC,RP,HF,TR,CP ¦ 2 (ℵ) [0.5%] ¦ --- 𝕻46B,NU ¦ 1 [2%] ἐλπίζει;
25Εἰ δὲ ὃ οὐ βλέπομεν ἐλπίζομεν, δι᾿ ὑπομονῆς ἀπεκδεχόμεθα.
4Ἵνα δὲ μὴ ἐπὶ πλέονπλεον f35 [20%] ¦ πλειον ℵA,B [79%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ πλιον A [1%] σε ἐγκόπτω, παρακαλῶ ἀκοῦσαί σε ἡμῶν συντόμως τῇ σῇ ἐπιεικείᾳ.
6ὃς καὶ τὸ ἱερὸν ἐπείρασεν βεβηλῶσαι· ὃν καὶ ἐκρατήσαμεν·1) (without the long addition) f35 ℵA,B (58.9%) HF,RP,NU 2) - 36): 7 και κατα τον ημετερον νομον ηθελησαμεν κριναι παρελθων δε λυσιας ο χιλιαρχος μετα πολλης βιας εκ των χειρων ημων απηγαγεν κελευσας τους κατηγορους αυτου ερχεσθαι επι σε. The five principle variations hinge on the three underlined words; they are: 2) κριναι … επι σε (9.7%) [6 variants] 8) κριναι … επι σου (10.5%) [14 variants] 22) κριναι … προς σε (5.3%) [8 variants] 30) κρινειν … επι σου (4.4%) [4 variants] 34) κρινειν … επι σε (1.7%) OC,TR [3 variants] (OC is in small print) 37) replaces απηγαγεν with five words, plus two other changes: κριναι … επι σου (3.2%) [2 variants] 39) completely rewrites the material: κριναι … προς σε (3.4%) CP [6 variants](eight further variants) (2.9%) [8 variants].Variant 2) presumably has the best claim to be the standard form of the addition: κριναι clearly bests κρινειν, επι clearly bests προς, σε barely bests σου. [Although variant 8) appears to be slightly stronger than 2) numerically, the 14 internal variants, compared to 6, effectively diminish its credibility. The main variant in 2) is far stronger than that of 8).] It is also attested by syr and latpt. However, although some form of the addition commands 41.1% of the MSS, there are no less than 51 variants! What about the context? The addition makes good sense, and it fits nicely. But, it is not really necessary; that information Felix already knew. The text reads quite well without the addition also. I conclude that the short form was judged to be abrupt or incomplete, giving rise to the addition; presumably the Autograph did not contain it. Since Tertullus was an orator he may well have actually said what is in the addition, plus a good deal more besides, but did Luke write it? (The incidents recorded in Acts were well known by many contemporaries, and there were many written accounts in circulation [Luke 1:1], so it was entirely predictable that a variety of historically correct material would be added, here and there, to Luke’s account.) The external evidence, though divided, is adequate to resolve this case: 58.9% against a severely fragmented 41.1%. The ancient versions, being divided, do not help us much this time. Although 59% is not a strong majority, by any means, still, the severe fragmentation of the 41% sort of leaves variant 1) without a worthy opponent. Variant 1) wins in "Antiquity", "Number", "Variety" and "Continuity", so I have no doubt that it is original. [The reading of the TR, variant 34), really has little to commend it.]
15ἐλπίδα ἔχων εἰς τὸν Θεόν, ἣν καὶ αὐτοὶ οὗτοι προσδέχονται, ἀνάστασιν μέλλειν ἔσεσθαι νεκρῶν,νεκρων f35 (93.4%) HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ --- ℵA,B,C (6.6%) NU δικαίων τε καὶ ἀδίκων.