11 Μὴ καταλαλεῖτε ἀλλήλων, ἀδελφοί. Ὁ γὰρ*35 [26%] ¦ --- ℵA,B [74%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (The conjunction makes the reason for the exhortation overt; without it that semantic connection is not clear.) καταλαλῶν ἀδελφοῦ καὶ*35 (84.3%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ η 𝕻100ℵA,B (15.3%) NU ¦ --- (0.4%) κρίνων τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ καταλαλεῖ νόμου καὶ κρίνει νόμον. Εἰ δὲ νόμον κρίνεις, οὐκ εἶ ποιητὴς νόμου ἀλλὰ κριτής. 12 Εἷς ἐστιν ὁ*35 ℵA [96.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP[NU] ¦ --- 𝕻100B [3.5%] Νομοθέτης καὶ Κριτής,*35 ℵA,B [62%] OC,NU ¦ --- [38%] RP,HF,TR,CP (The omission could be the result of homoioteleuton: -ΤΗϹ … -ΤΗϹ.) ὁ δυνάμενος σῶσαι καὶ ἀπολέσαι. Σὺ δὲ*35 𝕻100ℵA,B [94%] RP,HF,OC,CP,NU ¦ --- [6%] TR τίς εἶ ὃς κρίνεις*35 [85%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ο κρινων 𝕻100ℵA,B [15%] NU τὸν ἕτερον;*35 [88%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ πλησιον ℵA,B [12%] NU [The Alexandrian variant destroys the point of the paragraph. Each person is different (background, experiences, personality, training) and we must recognize that God can and will deal differently with different people. He uses one ‘law’ with me, another ‘law’ with you, and so on. A law is a set of rules or demands, so when I judge a brother I am questioning the way (‘law’) that God is working on him. As He is both Lawgiver and Judge, I will have to answer to Him for how I judged my ‘brothers’.]