52 resultados encontrados
6Ἐν ᾧ ἀγαλλιᾶσθε, ὀλίγον ἄρτι, εἰ δέον ἐστίν,εστιν f35 𝕻72A,C [98.6%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP [NU]ECM ¦ --- ℵB [1.4%] λυπηθέντεςλυπηθεντες f35 𝕻72A,B,C [75%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ λυπηθεντας ℵ [23.5%] ECM ¦ two other variants ἐν ποικίλοις πειρασμοῖς,
25Ὁ δέ·δε f35 [95%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ 1 παυλος ℵA,B [5%] NU «Οὐ μαίνομαι,» φησίν, «κράτιστε Φῆστε· ἀλλὰαλλα rell ¦ αλλ B [12%] TR ἀληθείας καὶ σωφροσύνης ῥήματα ἀποφθέγγομαι.
57Τί δέ, καὶ ἀφ᾿ ἑαυτῶν, οὐ κρίνετε τὸ δίκαιον;
18περὶ οὗ σταθέντες οἱ κατήγοροι οὐδεμίαν αἰτίαν ἐπέφερονεπεφερον f35 [85%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ εφερον ℵA,B,C [10%] NU ¦ υπεφερον [5%] ὧν ὑπενόουν ἐγώ,υπενοουν εγω f35 [91%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ 12 πονηραν [5%] ¦ ∼ 21 πονηρων B [1%] NU ¦ ∼ 21 πονηραν (ℵ)A,C [3%]
4δι᾿ ὧν τὰ τίμια ἡμῖν καὶ μέγιστα ἐπαγγέλματατιμια ημιν (υμιν 3.4%) και μεγιστα επαγγελματα f35 ℵ (81.6%) RP,HF,OC,CP ¦ ∼ 13425 B (6.6%) NU ¦ ∼ 13452 𝕻72 (0.4%) ¦ 1345 (0.6%) ¦ ∼ 43125 (A)C (8.6%) ¦ ∼ 42315 (1.2%) TR ¦ three further variations (1%) δεδώρηται, ἵνα διὰ τούτων γένησθε θείας κοινωνοὶ φύσεως, ἀποφυγόντες τῆς ἐν κόσμῳ ἐν ἐπιθυμίᾳ φθορᾶς.κοσμω εν (−εν 5%) επιθυμια φθορας f35 [87%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ τω 1234 A,B [alone] NU ¦ τω 1 επιθυμιαν 4 (φθοραν 𝕻72) 𝕻72ℵ [alone] ¦ 1 επιθυμιας και 4 C [5.6%] ¦ 1 επιθυμιας 4 [2%] ¦ τω 1 επιθυμιας και 4 [4%] ¦ three other variants [0.6%]
19Ἀπ᾿ ἄρτι λέγω ὑμῖν πρὸ τοῦ γενέσθαι, ἵνα ὅταν γένηται πιστεύσητεοταν γενηται πιστευσητε f35 A [98%] CP,HF,RP,OC,TR ¦ 12 πιστευσηται D,W [1%] ¦ 12 πιστευητε C ¦ ∼ 312 [0.5%] NU ¦ ∼ πιστευσηται 12 𝕻66ℵ ¦ ∼ πιστευητε 12 B ὅτι ἐγώ εἰμι.
47Ἀπεκρίθησαν οὖν αὐτοῖς οἱ Φαρισαῖοι· «Μὴ καὶ ὑμεῖς πεπλάνησθε;
46Ἐγώ, φῶς, εἰς τὸν κόσμον ἐλήλυθα, ἵνα πᾶς ὁ πιστεύων εἰς ἐμὲ ἐν τῇ σκοτίᾳ μὴ μείνῃ.
7Ὥστε οὔτε ὁ φυτεύων ἐστίν τι, οὔτε ὁ ποτίζων, ἀλλ᾿ ὁ αὐξάνων Θεός.
6ὃς καὶ τὸ ἱερὸν ἐπείρασεν βεβηλῶσαι· ὃν καὶ ἐκρατήσαμεν·1) (without the long addition) f35 ℵA,B (58.9%) HF,RP,NU 2) - 36): 7 και κατα τον ημετερον νομον ηθελησαμεν κριναι παρελθων δε λυσιας ο χιλιαρχος μετα πολλης βιας εκ των χειρων ημων απηγαγεν κελευσας τους κατηγορους αυτου ερχεσθαι επι σε. The five principle variations hinge on the three underlined words; they are: 2) κριναι … επι σε (9.7%) [6 variants] 8) κριναι … επι σου (10.5%) [14 variants] 22) κριναι … προς σε (5.3%) [8 variants] 30) κρινειν … επι σου (4.4%) [4 variants] 34) κρινειν … επι σε (1.7%) OC,TR [3 variants] (OC is in small print) 37) replaces απηγαγεν with five words, plus two other changes: κριναι … επι σου (3.2%) [2 variants] 39) completely rewrites the material: κριναι … προς σε (3.4%) CP [6 variants](eight further variants) (2.9%) [8 variants].Variant 2) presumably has the best claim to be the standard form of the addition: κριναι clearly bests κρινειν, επι clearly bests προς, σε barely bests σου. [Although variant 8) appears to be slightly stronger than 2) numerically, the 14 internal variants, compared to 6, effectively diminish its credibility. The main variant in 2) is far stronger than that of 8).] It is also attested by syr and latpt. However, although some form of the addition commands 41.1% of the MSS, there are no less than 51 variants! What about the context? The addition makes good sense, and it fits nicely. But, it is not really necessary; that information Felix already knew. The text reads quite well without the addition also. I conclude that the short form was judged to be abrupt or incomplete, giving rise to the addition; presumably the Autograph did not contain it. Since Tertullus was an orator he may well have actually said what is in the addition, plus a good deal more besides, but did Luke write it? (The incidents recorded in Acts were well known by many contemporaries, and there were many written accounts in circulation [Luke 1:1], so it was entirely predictable that a variety of historically correct material would be added, here and there, to Luke’s account.) The external evidence, though divided, is adequate to resolve this case: 58.9% against a severely fragmented 41.1%. The ancient versions, being divided, do not help us much this time. Although 59% is not a strong majority, by any means, still, the severe fragmentation of the 41% sort of leaves variant 1) without a worthy opponent. Variant 1) wins in "Antiquity", "Number", "Variety" and "Continuity", so I have no doubt that it is original. [The reading of the TR, variant 34), really has little to commend it.]
7—διὰ πίστεως γὰρ περιπατοῦμεν, οὐ διὰ εἴδους—
19ἐν τῇ ὑπομονῇ ὑμῶν κτήσασθε τὰς ψυχὰς ὑμῶν.)