14 resultados encontrados
13Δίκαιον δὲ ἡγοῦμαι, ἐφ᾿ ὅσονεφ᾿ ὁσον rell ¦ εφόσον f35 (I include this for the record, and so as not to lose sight of it. But since there is evidently no difference in meaning, I stay with the conventional pointing.) εἰμὶ ἐν τούτῳ τῷ σκηνώματι, διεγείρειν ὑμᾶς ἐν ὑπομνήσει,
12οἷς ἀπεκαλύφθη ὅτι οὐχ ἑαυτοῖς, ὑμῖνυμιν f35 𝕻72ℵA,B,C [86%] RP,HF,OC,CP,NU ¦ ημιν [14%] TR δέ, διηκόνουν αὐτά, ἃ νῦν ἀνηγγέλη ὑμῖν διὰ τῶν εὐαγγελισαμένων ὑμᾶς, ἐνεν f35 ℵC [96%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP[NU]ECM ¦ --- 𝕻72A,B [4%] Πνεύματι Ἁγίῳ ἀποσταλέντι ἀπ᾿ οὐρανοῦ—εἰς ἃ ἐπιθυμοῦσιν ἄγγελοι παρακύψαι.
17Ἐν τούτῳ τετελείωται ἡ ἀγάπη μεθ᾿ ἡμῶν· ἵνα παρρησίαν ἔχωμενεχωμεν rell ¦ εχομεν ℵ [12%] ¦ σχωμεν [1%] ἐν τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τῆς κρίσεως, ὅτι καθὼς ἐκεῖνός ἐστιν καὶ ἡμεῖς ἐσμεν ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ τούτῳ.
6ὃς καὶ τὸ ἱερὸν ἐπείρασεν βεβηλῶσαι· ὃν καὶ ἐκρατήσαμεν·1) (without the long addition) f35 ℵA,B (58.9%) HF,RP,NU 2) - 36): 7 και κατα τον ημετερον νομον ηθελησαμεν κριναι παρελθων δε λυσιας ο χιλιαρχος μετα πολλης βιας εκ των χειρων ημων απηγαγεν κελευσας τους κατηγορους αυτου ερχεσθαι επι σε. The five principle variations hinge on the three underlined words; they are: 2) κριναι … επι σε (9.7%) [6 variants] 8) κριναι … επι σου (10.5%) [14 variants] 22) κριναι … προς σε (5.3%) [8 variants] 30) κρινειν … επι σου (4.4%) [4 variants] 34) κρινειν … επι σε (1.7%) OC,TR [3 variants] (OC is in small print) 37) replaces απηγαγεν with five words, plus two other changes: κριναι … επι σου (3.2%) [2 variants] 39) completely rewrites the material: κριναι … προς σε (3.4%) CP [6 variants](eight further variants) (2.9%) [8 variants].Variant 2) presumably has the best claim to be the standard form of the addition: κριναι clearly bests κρινειν, επι clearly bests προς, σε barely bests σου. [Although variant 8) appears to be slightly stronger than 2) numerically, the 14 internal variants, compared to 6, effectively diminish its credibility. The main variant in 2) is far stronger than that of 8).] It is also attested by syr and latpt. However, although some form of the addition commands 41.1% of the MSS, there are no less than 51 variants! What about the context? The addition makes good sense, and it fits nicely. But, it is not really necessary; that information Felix already knew. The text reads quite well without the addition also. I conclude that the short form was judged to be abrupt or incomplete, giving rise to the addition; presumably the Autograph did not contain it. Since Tertullus was an orator he may well have actually said what is in the addition, plus a good deal more besides, but did Luke write it? (The incidents recorded in Acts were well known by many contemporaries, and there were many written accounts in circulation [Luke 1:1], so it was entirely predictable that a variety of historically correct material would be added, here and there, to Luke’s account.) The external evidence, though divided, is adequate to resolve this case: 58.9% against a severely fragmented 41.1%. The ancient versions, being divided, do not help us much this time. Although 59% is not a strong majority, by any means, still, the severe fragmentation of the 41% sort of leaves variant 1) without a worthy opponent. Variant 1) wins in "Antiquity", "Number", "Variety" and "Continuity", so I have no doubt that it is original. [The reading of the TR, variant 34), really has little to commend it.]
23—εἰ παθητὸς ὁ Χριστός· εἰ πρῶτος ἐξ ἀναστάσεως νεκρῶν φῶς μέλλειμελλει rell ¦ μελλειν [18%] ¦ μελλιν ℵ ¦ one other variant καταγγέλλειν τῷ τετε f35 ℵA,B [60%] NU ¦ --- [40%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP λαῷ καὶ τοῖς ἔθνεσιν.»
4Καὶ ἔπεσανεπεσαν f35 Ma⅓,dpt,e⅖,(g),h¼,i⅓ ℵA,C,OC,NU,TR ¦ επεσον Ma⅔,b,c2/7,dpt,e⅗,f,h,i⅔ CP,RP,HF (There being no difference in meaning, evidently, the spelling fluctuated.) (Although a significant minority of the f35 representatives read επεσον, the quality and geographic distribution of those reading επεσαν is sufficiently superior so that these presumably reflect the archetype.) οἱ πρεσβύτεροι οἱ εἴκοσι τέσσαρεςεικοσι τεσσαρες f35¼ Ma⅓(⅙),b,(d⅓),ept,f,g⅔,hpt,ipt ℵ(A)C,CP,RP,HF,NU ¦ κδ΄ f35 Ma⅓(⅐),(dpt),e⅓,g¼,h⅓ ¦ 1 και 2 Me⅙ (OC)TR,πρεσβυτεροι οι εικοσι τεσσαρες rell ¦ ∼ 23 και 41 OC καὶ τὰ τέσσαρα ζῷα καὶ προσεκύνησαν τῷ Θεῷ τῷ καθημένῳ ἐπὶ τοῦ θρόνουτου θρονου f35 Ma¼,d,e,g⅔,h¼,ipt CP,RP,TR ¦ τω θρονω Ma,b,f,g⅓,h,ipt ℵA,C,HF,OC,NU λέγοντες· «Ἀμήν· Ἀλληλούϊα.»
1Πρὸ δὲ τῆς ἑορτῆς τοῦ Πάσχα, εἰδὼς ὁ Ἰησοῦς ὅτι ἐλήλυθενεληλυθεν f35 [90%] CP,HF,RP,OC,TR ¦ ηλθεν ℵA,B,W [10%] NU ¦ ηκει 𝕻66 ¦ παρην D αὐτοῦ ἡ ὥρα ἵνα μεταβῇ ἐκ τοῦ κόσμου τούτου πρὸς τὸν Πατέρα, ἀγαπήσας τοὺς ἰδίους τοὺς ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ, εἰς τέλος ἠγάπησεν αὐτούς.
37Ὁ δὲ Ἰησοῦςιησους f35 (D)W [99%] RP,HF,OC,CP,TR ¦ --- ℵB [1%] NU ἔφηεφη rell ¦ ειπεν W [5%] TR αὐτῷ· « ‹Ἀγαπήσεις Κύριον τὸν Θεόν σου ἐν ὅλῃ τῇτη f35 D [40%] OC,TR,NU ¦ --- ℵB,W [60%] RP,HF,CP καρδίᾳ σου, καὶ ἐν ὅλῃ τῇτη f35 ℵD [60%] OC,TR,NU ¦ --- B,W [40%] RP,HF,CP ψυχῇ σου, καὶ ἐν ὅλῃ τῇ διανοίᾳ σου.›
38Αὕτη ἐστὶν πρώτη καὶ μεγάληπρωτη και μεγαλη f35 [95%] RP,HF,OC,CP,TR ¦ ∼ 321 D ¦ ∼ η 321 ℵB [3.5%] NU ¦ η 123 [1%] ¦ η 12 η 3 W ἐντολή.
42λέγων, «Τί ὑμῖν δοκεῖ περὶ τοῦ Χριστοῦ· τίνος υἱός ἐστιν;» Λέγουσιν αὐτῷ, «Τοῦ Δαυίδ.»
36Ἕωςεως f35 𝕻66 [98%] CP,HF,RP,OC,TR ¦ ως 𝕻75ℵA,B,D,W [2%] NU τὸ φῶς ἔχετε, πιστεύετε εἰς τὸ φῶς, ἵνα υἱοὶ φωτὸς γένησθε.» Ταῦτα ἐλάλησεν ὁο f35 𝕻75A,W [99.5%] CP,HF,RP,OC,TR ¦ --- 𝕻66ℵB,D [0.5%] NU Ἰησοῦς, καὶ ἀπελθὼν ἐκρύβη ἀπ᾿ αὐτῶν.
38ἵνα ὁ λόγος Ἡσαΐου τοῦ προφήτου πληρωθῇ, ὃν εἶπεν· «Κύριε, τίς ἐπίστευσεν τῇ ἀκοῇ ἡμῶν; Καὶ ὁ βραχίων Κυρίου τίνι ἀπεκαλύφθη;»
45Καὶ ὁ θεωρῶν ἐμὲ θεωρεῖ τὸν πέμψαντά με.
9Καὶ εἶπενκαι ειπεν f35 A,N,W [96%] CP,HF,RP,TR,OC ¦ ∼ 2 δε 𝕻75ℵB,C,D [4%] NU Ἡρῴδης,ηρωδης f35 𝕻75ℵA,C,D,W [95%] CP,HF,RP,NU ¦ ο 1 B,N [5%] TR,OC «Ἰωάννην ἐγὼ ἀπεκεφάλισα· τίς δέ ἐστιν οὗτος περὶ οὗ ἐγὼεγω f35 A,D,N,W [95%] CP,HF,RP,TR,OC ¦ --- 𝕻75ℵB,C [5%] NU ἀκούω τοιαῦτα;» Καὶ ἐζήτει ἰδεῖν αὐτόν.
3Ἀνθ᾿ ὧν ὅσα ἐν τῇ σκοτίᾳ εἴπατε ἐν τῷ φωτὶ ἀκουσθήσεται, καὶ ὃ πρὸς τὸ οὖς ἐλαλήσατε ἐν τοῖς ταμείοιςταμειοις rell ¦ ταμιειοις [14%] CP ¦ ταμιοις ℵA,W [5%] κηρυχθήσεται ἐπὶ τῶν δωμάτων.
3αἰτούμενοι χάριν κατ᾿ αὐτοῦ ὅπως μεταπέμψηται αὐτὸν εἰς Ἱερουσαλήμ—ἐνέδραν ποιοῦντες ἀνελεῖν αὐτὸν κατὰ τὴν ὁδόν.
4Ὁ μὲν οὖν Φῆστος ἀπεκρίθη τηρεῖσθαι τὸν Παῦλον ἐν Καισαρείᾳ,εν καισαρεια f35 [96%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ εις καισαρειαν (ℵA)B,C [4%] NU ἑαυτὸν δὲ μέλλειν ἐν τάχει ἐκπορεύεσθαι.
14Ὡς δὲ πλείους ἡμέρας διέτριβονδιετριβον f35 ℵA(B)C [55%] OC,TR,NU ¦ διετριβεν [45%] HF,RP,CP ἐκεῖ, ὁ Φῆστος τῷ βασιλεῖ ἀνέθετο τὰ κατὰ τὸν Παῦλον λέγων· «Ἀνήρ τίς ἐστιν καταλελειμμένος ὑπὸ Φήλικοςφηλικος f35 ℵA,B,C [52%] HF,RP,OC,TR,NU ¦ φιληκος [37%] CP ¦ φιλικος [11%] δέσμιος,
36Τίς ἐστιν οὗτος ὁ λόγοςουτος ο λογος f35 ℵ [90%] CP,HF,RP,OC,TR ¦ ∼ 231 𝕻66,75vB,D,N,W [10%] NU ὃν εἶπεν, ‹Ζητήσετέ με καὶ οὐχ εὑρήσετε·ευρησετε f35 𝕻66ℵD,N,W [99.5%] CP,HF,RP,OC,TR ¦ 1 με 𝕻75B [0.5%] [NU] καί, ὅπου εἰμὶ ἐγὼ ὑμεῖς οὐ δύνασθε ἐλθεῖν›;»
20Εἶπεν δὲ ὅτι «Οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι συνέθεντο τοῦ ἐρωτῆσαί σε ὅπως αὔριον εἰς τὸ συνέδριον καταγάγῃς τὸν Παῦλον,εις το συνεδριον καταγαγης τον παυλον f35 [88%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ∼ 564123 ℵA,B [7%] NU ¦ ∼ 456123 [5%] ὡς μέλλοντές1) μελλοντες f35 (33.1%) TR,CP 2) μελλοντα (27.2%) HF,RP 3) μελλοντων (17.4%) OC 4) μελλων A,B (9.2%) 5) μελλον ℵ (7.5%) NU6) μελλοντας (5.4%) (one other) (0.2%) Rather a dismaying picture—what to do? To begin, the variants are all participial forms of the same verb. The key seems to be the perceived referent or antecedent of the participle. Is it "the Jews", "the Sanhedrin" or "the commander"? The best answer from the point of view of the grammar is evidently "the Jews", which would require a masc., nom., plural form—the only candidate is variant 1). However, there were those who took the referent to be "the Sanhedrin"—the Alexandrian MSS have συνεδριον next to the participle, separated only by ως. The grammar requires a neuter, acc., sg. form—variant 5). But, the Sanhedrin was made up of men, so perhaps some decided it would be more appropriate to make it plural—variant 2); and maybe even masc. besides—variant 6) [might this be assimilation to verse 15?]. Variant 3), being genitive, is really strange, unless somehow someone thought that the commander intended to inquire of the Sanhedrin, viewed as plural. Variant 4) presumably takes "the commander" as the referent, but puts the form in the nom., sort of ad sensum since σε is acc. But variant 2) could also be referring to the commander, precisely masc., acc., singular. What are the requirements of the context? "The commander" as referent does not fit. Not only was it not his idea, he sent Paul away that very night to forestall the possibility. (That the Jews should attempt to tell the commander what was in his mind is scarcely credible.) "The Sanhedrin" as referent really doesn’t fit either. το συνεδριον appears in the text as the object of a preposition, not as an initiating agent. It is "the Jews" that is the Subject of the main verb, and therefore of the two infinitives, and our participle is working with the second infinitive, "as ones intending to inquire". Conclusion: variant 1) is the only one that really fits the context; it is also the best attested. Although it only musters 33.1% of the vote (including f35), it is also attested by the three ancient versions—always weighty testimony. I conclude that the Autograph read μελλοντες. τι ἀκριβέστερον πυνθάνεσθαι περὶ αὐτοῦ.